The Seahawks and the NFL’s Best Home Field Advantage

by Andrew Mooney

A road game in the NFL can be a daunting proposition. Facing a sufficiently amped home crowd, a team has to worry about things they normally wouldn’t at home: snap counts, hearing play calls, and hey, what is that biker-looking gentleman doing with a blown-up picture of my family? Every NFL fan base would like to believe its savage passion is the most intense in the league, but there can’t be 32 best home field advantages. To that end, I set about finding which team’s home field gives them the largest boost.

First, I don’t think it makes sense to attribute the effects of a team’s home field advantage solely to the fans; you can’t separate the noise they make from the environment in which they make it, the stadium. It’s possible that fans in Seattle truly go bananas for the Seahawks, but the stadium’s architecture (or even its PA system) likely contributes at least some part to pumping up the volume at CenturyLink Field. Similarly, Boston fans exhibit plenty of passion and noise at Celtics, Bruins, and Red Sox games. Why should they be so notoriously quiet for the Patriots, unless Gillette Stadium itself (or, I suppose, the commute there) muted them?

For that reason, I centered my analysis on which team’s stadium the combined effect of the building and the fans produces the greatest home field advantage. Instead of using home and away win-loss records, I looked up teams’ point differentials at home and on the road from the time they moved into their current stadium, using the ultra-handy Play Index at Pro Football Reference. (There is considerable evidence that point differentials provide a more reliable measure of team quality than do simple wins and losses.)

Next, I calculated the difference between each team’s point differential at home and on the road, then divided that by the number of seasons the team has occupied its stadium. This gave me the average number of additional points per season provided by a team’s home field advantage. The Chargers have played in what is now Qualcomm Stadium since 1967, but assuming the home field advantage effect it affords has been constant over that time, its per-season average should be as valid as that of Philadelphia’s Lincoln Financial Field, which began hosting NFL play in 2003. Finally, in order to ensure that I had a sufficient sample of games, I omitted teams who moved into a new stadium within the last five seasons, which included the Colts, the Jets, the Giants, and the Cowboys. I also counted the major overhaul to Soldier Field in 2003 as a new stadium, given the way it drastically altered the building’s structure. My results are presented below.


This analysis bears out the conventional wisdom, at least at the extremes: Seattle enjoys the greatest home field advantage in the NFL, and Gillette Stadium ranks at the bottom of the league. Recently, the Ravens have borne out that M&T Bank Stadium is one of the hardest places to play in the country; they currently boast the NFL’s longest home winning streak at 13 games.

It’s surprising to see the Superdome so low, with its at least anecdotal status as one of the loudest stadiums in the NFL. The top ten features only three enclosed stadiums, and not necessarily the ones you expect Ford Field, the Edward Jones Dome, and the Metrodome. Again, team quality over this time should have nothing to do with the final outcome, since we’re comparing the same teams’ home and away results.

So what’s the deal with Gillette? As Chris Gasper noted a couple of years ago, the stadium itself is largely to blame: its open-ended architecture doesn’t hold sound well, its location forces everyone to rush for the exits to avoid traffic once the result is assured, and it’s one of the priciest stadiums in the NFL, especially when you factor in transportation costs to get there. Mr. Kraft may be happy with the money the place rakes in, but if he wanted to give an assist to his product on the field, he might consider phasing out the wine-and-cheese folks and drawing a slightly more populist crowd.

This post can also be seen on here.

This entry was posted in NFL Football. Bookmark the permalink.

36 Responses to The Seahawks and the NFL’s Best Home Field Advantage

  1. Dave says:

    I did a similar analysis a couple of years ago and had some similar findings (with Baltimore near the top and NE near the bottom, etc). Having said that, here is some food for thought:
    – Your analysis does not distinguish between a good home team and a bad road team
    – It could be the case that the distance traveled, or time zones crossed/time of day is a major cause of home field advantage (is Seattle’s HFA just as high against NFC/AFC West teams as it is for the rest of the league?)

  2. Jack says:

    Agreeing with Dave’s second point. 4 of the top 5 teams play in western divisions that require significantly more travel than other divisions. Seattle’s home field advantage has more to do with getting to and from Seattle than anything that occurs at the stadium itself.

    • Dan says:

      LOL. Youve obviously never been to Seahawks stadium. When you travel from the east, theres not much of a difference between flying to Seattle and SF, Oak, SD and AZ.

  3. Hamish says:

    I think Daves first point is also key. The Patriots are disadvantaged here because their away Pt diff is seriously high in their favor. This makes the end result very low because of the small differential between their home and away

  4. Micah says:

    The travel distance is certainly a factor in both directions (ie, raising the SEA home advantage and lowering the NE home advantage.) Other reasonable observations that should be included in the analysis include playing surface, team gameplay/style, and the overall team quality. There are several simple explanations as to why NE has such a low home-field advantage: they score a lot of points on the road, their late season home games frequently have adverse weather are among the most obvious. Another thing to consider is time; comparing NO for the last 37 years is not at all like comparing NE for the last 10.

    The simple analysis is good and interesting, but few reasonable conclusions can be drawn from it without also reviewing the other factors.

  5. TBK58 says:

    Just for the record …. CenturyLink Field does NOT pump in noise. It’s the real deal up here.

    • MS says:

      Absolutely TBK. The 12th man is no joke. Another stat that should suggest that we dominate is the fact that we have led the league in false start penalties since the inception of the stadium.

  6. ivotuk says:

    a lot has to do with the amount of travel a team has to do in a season. Seattle, San Fran and San Diego tend to travel the most miles each year. That and they have to start much earlier than they are used to on the east coast. Add Oakland to that group.

  7. Charles says:

    The pats have been equally dominant on the road as at home so it’s twisted logic to say that therefore their home field advantage is not as good as other places when their per game actual points scored at home is likely tops in the league for that stretch. The Pats are 77-16 at Gillette including the playoffs. I know all the statheads think point differential is more important than wins and losses but 77-16 counts for something. I think I saw somewhere that it is the best winning % through 90 games in NFL history at home. Seattle’s stadium opened in 2002 and over that time they have scored about 5 points more per game than their opponents at home. The pats are at ~9 points per game. This article is cherry-picking stats at its worst.

  8. Pingback: Playoff Odds | Seattle Fandom

  9. Pingback: 5-3 vs. 4-4 (Playoff odds) | Seattle Fandom

  10. jay says:

    Style of play also factors. A balanced team that controls the clock and drives the field may not score as many points per minute but their % of scoring drives can still be substantial with a solid T.O.P. As such, a team could win in dominant fashion, but the final score could be 17-6, whereas another high-flying team could create bigger plays, winning a back and forth shootout 45-31. The point differential for defensive teams will be lower, despite possessing a greater % of scoring differential and not a high TOTAL differential in straight points.

  11. gary thompson says:

    If the point differential will be lower for predominantly defensive teams, then why are the Seahawks at the top of the list?

  12. Pingback: Debunking the Trap Game and Letdown Game Myths | The Harvard College Sports Analysis Collective

  13. Pingback: » Catholic Seven Basketball: Who Has the Best Home-Court Advantage? Hoya Paranoia | The Hoya's Sports Blog

  14. Generally I do not read post on blogs, but I would
    like to say that this write-up very forced me to try and do it!

    Your writing style has been surprised me. Thanks, very nice post.

  15. Hey there I am so excited I found your blog, I really found you
    by accident, while I was searching on Google for something else, Anyways I am here now and would just
    like to say many thanks for a marvelous post and a all round exciting blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to look over it all at the moment
    but I have book-marked it and also added in your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will
    be back to read a lot more, Please do keep up the superb work.

  16. Aw, this was a very good post. Spending some time and actual effort to make a really
    good article… but what can I say… I put things off a lot and never seem to
    get anything done.

  17. phoenix area says:

    each time i used to read smaller articles or reviews
    that also clear their motive, and that is also happening with this article which
    I am reading now.

  18. Volume12 says:

    Have you heard about the recent application to break the world record for sound at CenturyLink stadium?

  19. Hi, i feel that i saw you visited my weblog so i came to go
    back the prefer?.I’m trying to find things to enhance my website!I assume its good enough to make use of a few of
    your concepts!!

  20. Moncler Outlet Online Store. Cheap Moncler Jackets, Moncler Coats and Moncler Vests
    michael kors outlet online

  21. Pingback: False Beliefs About False Starts: The Myth of CenturyLink Field | Crossroads of an Economic Sportsfan

  22. Pingback: A Packers fan, Jon Niemuth, is the reason it’s impossible to beat the Seattle Seahawks at home | The Context Of Things

  23. Pingback: NFC Championship Game: San Francisco @ Seattle — 49ers Hot, Seahawks Homey | Jim Zorn's Lemma

  24. jj says:

    New England has the highest home win % since 2002. Thats when Century Link and Gillette opened. Seattle has the 6th highest win % at home…6th. All other numbers are garbage. 85% win at home vs. 65%, thats all you need to look at.

    • Rick Bagnall says:

      Eh. I wouldn’t go that far. The Pats have been good in general since 2002 (they’ve only missed the playoffs twice in that span, both times with winning records, and they turned in four 14-win seasons. Well, three 14-win seasons and a 16-win season.), whereas the Seahawks have struggled during several of those seasons. Personnel makes a difference. I don’t think any team is afraid to go to Gillette, so much as they just don’t want to face the Patriots in general. But even when the ‘Hawks were slogging through 4- and 5-win seasons recently, the Clink was still intimidating.

      You brag about the Patriots’ 85% winning percentage at home since 2002 while glossing over their 76% overall winning percentage. You sneer at the Seahawks’ 65% winning percentage at home since 2002 while ignoring their 56% overall winning percentage. The article wasn’t about which teams perform best at home, it was about which teams have the greatest home field *advantage*. There’s a difference between the two, subtle though it may be. And simply put, over the last 13 years, the Patriots have been good just about everywhere they’ve played, while the Seahawks have been noticeably better at home.

  25. Pingback: NFL Week 3 Elo Ratings And Playoff Odds – FiveThirtyEight | Quick & Fast Sports News

  26. Pingback: NFL Week 3 Elo Ratings And Playoff Odds | Pally News

  27. Pingback: NFL Week 3 Elo Ratings And Playoff Odds – FiveThirtyEight | Latest News Portal Info

  28. Pingback: NFL Week 3 Elo Ratings And Playoff Odds |

  29. Pingback: NFL Week 3 Elo Ratings And Playoff Odds | International Reaction

  30. I cannot believe how ignorant this theory is……and what’s worse is that only a handful of people understand this. Many readers are actually commending this as a great article, as superb work. Your own numbers point out that the NE Patriots have the greatest positive point differential on a seasonly basis… far; including twice that of Seattle. But the Patriots are also the most dominant road team. Your logic twists this fact into a negative attribute. You’re distorted theory lists the best home team in the NFL (by every measure- W/L, point dif, et. al) as the worst. I’ve read many theories that seem off base but I’ve never seen an author state a theory that is diametrically opposite his own data.

    • Rick Bagnall says:

      Here’s the thing: he’s not asking the question “which NFL team plays the best at home”, he’s asking “which NFL team has the greatest home field *advantage*”. There is a difference between the two questions. The fact that the Patriots have been the most dominant road team over the past 13 seasons is a testament to Belichick and Brady, no doubt about it, as is the fact that they’ve been the most dominant home team during that stretch. But home field *advantage* is about playing noticeably better at home than on the road, and the Patriots haven’t really done that. This isn’t to say that teams look forward to playing in Gillette…but it’s because they have to face the Patriots, not because they have to contend with the crowd noise.

      Talk to me after Brady retires and the Patriots slog through a couple of ten-loss seasons. If the Patriots do something like the Seahawks did a few years back (4-4 at home–outscoring the opposition 163-130, including a pair of shutouts–and 1-7 on the road, getting outscored 117-260), then maybe I’ll believe that the Patriots have a good home field *advantage*.

  31. jim valis says:

    Point differential? Talk about overthinking it. Just win baby.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s